My project thread
Agriculture collects solar energy two-dimensionally; but silviculture collects it three dimensionally.
Cj Verde wrote:Three questions:
1: Why does it need to be skiddable?
2: Can we see it being ....not sure what the proper word is... skud? skidded?
3: It could be an illusion but it looks like a wind could whip up and catch under the roof and flip it. Is it not really that way or will it be tied/anchored down?
Ask me about food.
How Permies.com Works (lots of useful links)
Hugekultur; Beekeeping; Organic gardening; Vermiculture; Composting
Philly Duncan wrote:I am wondering what effect the electric fencing will have on the bees.
find religion! church
kiva! hyvä! iloinen! pikkumaatila
get stung! beehives
be hospitable! host-a-hive
be antisocial! facespace
Cj Verde wrote:Three questions:
3: It could be an illusion but it looks like a wind could whip up and catch under the roof and flip it. Is it not really that way or will it be tied/anchored down?
Moderator, Treatment Free Beekeepers group on Facebook.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/treatmentfreebeekeepers/
Michael Cox wrote:I too was going to ask what value you see in making it skidable, as opposed to a static structure. The old adage in beekeeping is you either move the hive 3ft or 3 miles. Anything in between and the bees can get lost, the fly off foraging and return to the old site rather than the new.
I would think you could get the same benefits (animal protection, security in winter, multiple sites for bee fodder) by moving the hives themselves through a series of structures - moving that huge structure, even on skids looks like a mammoth task, especially if there is any slope involved! That said, I'd love to be proved wrong when you do come to move it. Make sure you get good videos!
I do see the logic in the heavy duty critter protection where you are - I'm quite glad we don't have to contend with bears over here in the UK.
Moving beehives more than 2 feet and less than 2 miles
This is a subject apparently full of controversy. There is an old saying that you move a hive 2 feet or two miles. I often need to move them 100 yards more or less. I've never seen that it was a problem. I move hives as seldom as I need to because anytime you move a hive even two feet, it disrupts the hive for a day. But if I need to, I move them. I didn't invent all of the concepts here, but some of them I refined for my uses. Here is my technique.
It occurs to me that a lot of detail that is intuitively obvious to me may not be to a newbie. So here is a detailed description of how I usually move hives single handedly. This is assuming the hive is too heavy to move in one piece or I lack the help to do so. But it works so well, I don't even think about using other methods. But if you have help and can lift it, you can block the entrance and move it all at once at night and put a branch in front. I know every time I tell any version of this method, someone quotes the "2 feet or 2 miles" rule and says you can't do it and you can only move them two feet or you'll lose all your bees. I've done this many times with no noticeable loss of workforce and no bees clustering at the old location by the next night.
"If you will live like no one else, later you can live like no one else." -- Dave Ramsey
Chris Gray wrote:
Cj Verde wrote:Three questions:
3: It could be an illusion but it looks like a wind could whip up and catch under the roof and flip it. Is it not really that way or will it be tied/anchored down?
Even though it looks like it could be a little top heavy, if you know how heavy logs that size are, you will realize that that thing isn't going anywhere unless a tornado picks it up! The roof will come off first!
I would think that monster would be hard to move even with the skids!
My project thread
Agriculture collects solar energy two-dimensionally; but silviculture collects it three dimensionally.
Philly Duncan wrote:I am wondering what effect the electric fencing will have on the bees.
Martin Miljkovic wrote:One point about the design of the "bee hut". I feel that it is not too much "user friendly" since you need to climb in order to have good frame manipulation. Making it 30cm shorter might had proven easier for you to work with them. That way you could work with them from the ground.
My project thread
Agriculture collects solar energy two-dimensionally; but silviculture collects it three dimensionally.
Cj Verde wrote:Three questions:
1: Why does it need to be skiddable?
Location: Ohio, Zone 6a
Suburban lot (for now)
My books, movies, videos, podcasts, events ... the big collection of paul wheaton stuff!
A.J. Gentry wrote:
Does 'skiddable' mean that based on the way it is built it can be moved by a forklift?
My project thread
Agriculture collects solar energy two-dimensionally; but silviculture collects it three dimensionally.
Tell me how it all turns out. Here is a tiny ad:
two giant solar food dehydrators - one with rocket assist
https://solar-food-dehydrator.com
|