r ransom wrote:Why is there no E-sharp?
Was he a bad little letter and didn't eat all his vegetables?
Why are there so many sounds missing in European music?
Disclaimer - I'm tone deaf, can't read music, and for the most part can't even listen to it as it overwhelms me and I seem to interpret it differently to most people. But I too have occasionally attempted to understand how it works and how to read it.
This is how I visualise it...
Imagine you are walking along -
right, left, right, left, right...
Where each right foot hits there's a note. The sharps and flats are 'extras' where the left foot hits. Except whoever decided how to write the notes down is as bad at math and logic as I am at music, and he wasn't consistent.
In fact, he made the notes go something more like -
right, right, right, left, left, left, left, right
I actually asked my other half for help constructing that. He says it starts at middle C and goes up a whole octave.
So the first
right is C, the second is D, the third is E. Then he counts the next note on the step made by the left foot. So there's no E sharp as that step has been declared to be F.
The sounds aren't missing, just mis-named.
And then of course other cultures have different stride lengths so their notes fall in different places. And there are all the other places along the path that don't line up with where the feet landed when the path was first laid out.
Hope that helps!
Also, you guys have no idea how hard that was to write as someone who is not only tone deaf and can't read music, but also can't tell left from right...