• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
permaculture forums growies critters building homesteading energy monies kitchen purity ungarbage community wilderness fiber arts art permaculture artisans regional education skip experiences global resources cider press projects digital market permies.com pie forums private forums all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
master stewards:
  • Anne Miller
  • r ranson
  • Pearl Sutton
  • Leigh Tate
  • Beau Davidson
  • Nicole Alderman
  • paul wheaton
master gardeners:
  • Carla Burke
  • John F Dean
  • Nancy Reading
  • Jay Angler
  • Jules Silverlock
  • Mike Barkley
  • Jordan Holland
  • Likes 3
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Listen Online

Get all of the Podcasts in convenient, giant zip files
Subscribe on iTunes


Paul continues his call with Alan Booker on the subject of the BBB. And although they started section 2.3 last podcast, they still don’t finish it…

2.3: Applying laws and principles to design (continued)

Most of the carbon that a tree uses to build itself is sequestered from the air, then when leaves fall or the tree rots, the carbon is used to make soil.  Alan argues that Rocket mass heaters are thus carbon-negative because even if you were to burn the entire tree in an efficient manner, the overall process of the tree growing would have taken more carbon out of the air than burning it would have released.  Burning junk mail and Amazon packaging in an RMH could be more environmentally friendly than taking it to a local recycling center?  Need to do the math on that, but it’s possible.

Tesla Roadster effect: instead of making laws to dictate how permaculture should be done, create the permaculture equivalent of Tesla’s Roadster – something that makes the idea you’re selling so appealing that it becomes an almost must-have thing.

“Every object must responsibly provide for its replacement” Difference between legal-must, and natural-order-must.  Legal must implies threat of legal action.  Natural order must implies a physical inevitable.  “You must not dance on the edge of a cliff” could be taken in a “I have a right to” manner, instead of the intended warning of “you will probably fall and die”.  Working with ecological systems requires us to work with principles rather than narrowly defined laws.  Principles lead to strategies that vary by biome, etc. that lead to individual technique and tactics.

Future podcast plan to do a page-by-page review of Ecotopia.  Alan agreed knowing full well that they’d never make it through this book.

Relevant Threads

"Permaculture - a designers' manual" forum

The Big Black Book - summary, reviews,and where to buy

Support the Empire

Help support the empire and get all of the podcasts in a bundle here in the digital market at permies.

To support production of these podcasts, make a donation here at Paul's Patreon page.

This podcast was made possible thanks to:

Dr. Hugh Gill Kultur
Eivind W. Bjørkavåg
Suleiman, Karrie, and Sasquatch
Bill Crim
Kerry JustTooLazy
Jocelyn Campbell
Wade Luger
Kyle Neath
Chris Sugg
Bill Erickson
Dominic Crolius
Julia Winter, world's slowest mosaic artist
G Cooper
Penny McLoughlin
Ash Jackson
Mehron Kugler
Lisa Goodspeed
Pasquale DeAngelis
Sean Benedict
Greg Martin
Rita Bliden
Dana Martin
Candace Dahlk
Keith Kuhnsman
Eric Tolbert
Ruwan Nanayakkara
Polly Jayne Smyth
It was the best of times. It was the worst of times. It was a tiny ad.
Planning the 2023 Permaculture Technology Jamboree - poor man's poll
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic