David Binner wrote:I'd like to get a better idea how the micro-climates around my home differ from each other, and am thinking about buying three or four max/min thermometers to see how temperatures vary by location.
I'm especially interested in learning how big a difference it makes to place potted plants right up against the house. (Will the warmth of the house keep some of these plants alive through winter?)
If there is a big difference between a thermometer placed right up against the house and one placed at the far side of the backyard, it would also give me an indication that a lot of heat is escaping from the house.
In any case, I'd like to place one thermometer right against the house on the south side.
That would be in direct sunshine, which I've read is a no-no.
So, I am wondering, what is the recommended practice for getting an accurate temperature reading in a location?
Is it simply a matter of putting the thermometer in a cardboard box (to get it out of direct sunshine)?
A styrofoam box? etc.?
Any other factors to consider to ensure accurate readings at each location?
Kaarina Kreus wrote:Thanks Anne and John! Gosh I love this forum!
I have recycled cans that used to have industrially produced food. I'd guess their production temps are at pressure canning level. And I have these silicon sealed ones. I guess the worst that can happen is that I get soup instead of canned produce š
The woodstove is a personality, but I'm.used to it. In the restaurant we had these huge steel plates that were turned on in the morning and off in the evening. We used risers to control the temperatures and I do the same with my wood stove. I add up to three to control the temps.
Mark ruhl wrote:I kind of happened upon natural building recently. Why? Iāve built houses for a good period of my life and so Iāve always known I would eventually build my own house. I liked the free sculpting ability of cob and its thermal mass and I knew I wouldnāt want to build a ātraditionalā home. Or wood frame insulated home. Now I do live in a cold humid and very rainy area in which contraction and freezing might cause some issues with cob.
What Iāve been envisioning is a somewhat Dutch style white stucco 6x6 beam supported structure single level most of the time maybe double level. This of course would take some time with cob for sure and I wonder about the resale ability of cob homes.
I checked into the thermal mass of cob vs the r value of traditional.
Now hay bale wasnāt very interesting to be but in NS I saw that paper about building hay bale homes and it roused some novel interest.
Today I happened upon aircrete and it does seem to be the fastest to build a home with easiest least labour intense method and if mixed myself quite cheap.
However the point of this post is me trying to find and studies on the efficiency of the 3 materials compared to eachother. Aircrete is water permiable so naturally I wonder about what materials Iād need to keep moisture out of my house. Anyone have insight on which of the 3 is the MOST energy efficient