Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
permaculture forums growies critters building homesteading energy monies kitchen purity ungarbage community wilderness fiber arts art permaculture artisans regional education skip experiences global resources cider press projects digital market permies.com pie forums private forums all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
master stewards:
  • Carla Burke
  • Nancy Reading
  • John F Dean
  • r ranson
  • Jay Angler
  • paul wheaton
stewards:
  • Pearl Sutton
  • Liv Smith
  • Anne Miller
master gardeners:
  • Timothy Norton
  • Christopher Weeks
gardeners:
  • Andrés Bernal
  • Jeremy VanGelder
  • Matt McSpadden

flat roof minimum slope? (green roof)

 
Posts: 60
Location: Wessex
1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Report post to moderator
hi folks!

I'm a first-timer with timber framing. I'm trying to put up an open-sided workshop in my woodland camp. Flat roof, monopitch on a slightly sloping site.

First question: For simplicity I have left all the chestnut uprights the same length (7 feet) and I'm relying on the slope of the land to drain the roof. Is that OK?

Second question: The ground on the site slopes about 4% (or about 1:30) - is that sufficient to avoid water collecting on the roof?


(I intend to cover it with a pond liner and grow a thin green roof up there, if possible)

Here you can see a picture of progress so far, posted today 12 October 2014:
https://permies.com/t/39706/timber/stone-plinths-timber-frame-uprights

Cheers,
Paul
(Hampshire, UK)
 
Posts: 2679
Location: Phoenix, AZ (9b)
200
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Report post to moderator
Paul:

I don't know the answer to your question - I'm hoping someone else will chime in here. I will say that for grading around houses and for grading streets, the number used is 2% grade. 4% seems like it would be good. Let's see what some of the green builders say.
 
Posts: 2413
48
  • Likes 1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Report post to moderator
Hi Paul,

First, "Timber frame" in most of the world outside the U.K. means traditional wood building with timbers and all wood joints. What is called "timber framing" in the U.K. really isn't...it is "stick framing" or more technically called "light stud framing" and in its original mid nineteenth century "balloon stud framing."

What I see in your photos is a "hybrid" of "post and beam" (which uses metal fasteners) and some "light frame lintels." Regrettably you have relied on the shear strength of the metal fasteners to take the load of the roof, and this WILL NOT be sufficient to support the weight of even most simple flat roofs over time...let alone...the massive weight of a living roof.

I do not intend to be a "downer" or sound negative (sorry about that ) yet I am not really seeing a long life for the structure as it has been built. The approaches used are out of context for intended application, as the post bottoms are entirely too close to grade which will lead to "dry rot" fungus in short order in that biome type.

I would, while you still can, read and study a bit more about traditional timber framing methods (or mixed modalities) and perhaps embrace them as you could be using your building resources more efficiently and effectively. I would also recommend having some good design plans drawn up by yourself (or someone else) and submit them here for feedback from folks.

If the frame, as it is now, will be encapsulated in a thick Cob wall, with a larger roof overhang...it might be possible to salvage the current frame with some augmentation.

Again...apologies for coming across as being such a downer to your plans...but the structure does not seem built for your planned intent.


Regards,

j
 
Paul Ryan
Posts: 60
Location: Wessex
1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Report post to moderator
Thanks Jay C. White Cloud for your valued input.

>First, "Timber frame" in most of the world outside the U.K. means traditional wood building with timbers and all wood joints.
Point taken.

>Regrettably you have relied on the shear strength of the metal fasteners to take the load of the roof, and this WILL NOT be sufficient to support the weight of even most simple flat roofs over time...let alone...the massive weight of a living roof.
You're right. I'm dropping the green roof idea. I will do a bit more measuring and geometry and, if necessary, will increase the gradient on the roof to ensure no water can collect. As you say, it won't be able to take any significant extra weight on top.


As for rot, my neighbour has been using similar chestnut poles for about ten years without a problem (and his are touching the soil, while mine are an inch above it on concrete footings with a copper gasket between the wood and the concrete).
It's only supposed to be a bit of shelter from the rain, so the standard of building required is not to the same level as for a home. Nevertheless, thanks for making me stop and think about the weight issue - a green roof was never going to work, even with very thin soil.


I have regrettably cross-posted about this project. See here: https://permies.com/t/39706/timber/stone-plinths-timber-frame-uprights
I think I'll close this post down and continue with the other one (to which you have already contributed - thanks!)
 
Beauty is in the eye of the tiny ad.
A rocket mass heater heats your home with one tenth the wood of a conventional wood stove
http://woodheat.net
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic