ive often wondered about this, the flame weeders ive seen use propane---aaarrrggg--- fossil fuel use----not a good thing
when wildfires sweep through areas the charred remains become fertilizer and the new growth is spectacular ---a good thing
so burning an area when its safe to do so can be a good thing
I had a CSA years ago where the farmer used them in his fields. It was a great time saver instead of pulling weeds. For me, personally, I have a small space and beasts that eat the weeds so I wouldn't use it, though flamethrowers might be fun?? (not sure, don't hold me to that, also, fuel canisters, etc etc).
If you're able to keep up with mulching you might not need it, it depends on what your situation is where you are, of course.
I vote "no." My gut feeling is that flame weeders are a solution looking for a problem. In other words, a gimmick. It's just a plumbers propane torch on a stick, for a lot more money, expensive to run, and can only be used for one thing. Doesn't kill taproots. I really don't get it.
Edit: maybe I'm thinking of the wrong thing? Link please?
I know someone who has one. She reportedly is followed around outside by her husband, carrying a pail of water lest she light the house on fire (and she has come close).
That being said, her yard is pretty weed free and she has a lot of fun...
I can see the appeal as a fun way to get rid of driveway weeds, but would balk at the price. Plus, ergonomically they look not great to me.
If I were market gardening, I would invest in a few loads of woodchips or other mulch instead, and well composted manure. Keeps the weeds down and makes them easy to pull, reduces watering needs, keeps the soil more consistently moist, etc. Maybe a wheel hoe and some good standing weeding tools/hoes.
They are very much worth it for some crops, carrots and parsnips I like it for. I'm not sure where you guys are looking at prices but they are very cheap here (single burners not the one that do 75cm at a time) and take the same gas canister as the cooker, so no extra equipment needed there. In a market gardening sense you use them on weed seedlings not full grown weeds. Saying that I only use mine a couple of times a year so it's certainly not an essential piece of equipment
I own one. For me, it is worth the investment. But, this is one of the many "your mileage may vary" things that we encounter in life. I use it in the rainy times only.... I am very concerned about fires with it. I should be. The first year I used it, i was very careful. I hosed down every place i had used it with water. The next morning i was missing 6 bales of straw. I counted myself as lucky. My guess is i missed a spark, and that is all it took. I am ultra cautious now. I use it in early mornings and check where I used it several times during the day. Another negative is that is you use it for a few hours, expect to go through $20 of LP. That said, at least once a year i knock out a weeks worth of weed control in a couple of hours. For me, it is worth the trade off.
"Good decisions come from experience. Experience comes from bad decisions." ... Mark Twain
Location: Canadian Prairies - Zone 3b
posted 1 month ago
After my previous post I looked up some of the commercial grade units. Very different from the 8,000 BTU cane style I had previously seen.
I can see their utility in some situations. As soon as weeding involves paid labour, this would be less expensive overall.
I love my flame weeder. It's great for burning weeds in gravel, along the rock mulch and rock slopes in our yard, and along any grass edge to make a nice edge (barring the other side of the grass being wood chips). My alternatives would be to either hand pick (which I do for the big weeds anyways) but it's pretty hard to pick most weeds out of rock, or use a weed killer. I fugure the torch is much better for the environement than a weed killer and it's more economical as well. Plus, it is a whole lot of fun toasting weeds:) You do have to very careful about using it in the summer, though, of course, but it is doable.