Wow.
I read this
http://healthwyze.org/index.php/cancer-revisited-the-industry-suppressed-budwig-regimen-or-how-to-cure-cancer-with-cottage-cheese.html It's disturbing that people actually believe this. And frankly, when I was reading the comments, I was angry. This author is preying on people who are desperate for hope and feeding them bad information that will get them killed. I'm all for a healthy diet and obviously I like the things we talk about on this forum (or I wouldn't be here) but when people start promoting flaxseed and cottage cheese and saying that surgery and therapy is bad for their cancer is irresponsible and morally reprehensible.
I've had several patients who went to "healers" who promoted various diets and treatments and claimed to cure cancer. When I first saw them, they had cancers that were treatable and curable. They left and went on one of these diets for two or three months and then they come back to clinic and their tumor has grown to the point that it is no longer resectable and I basically have to tell them that I have no curative therapy to offer them anymore.
Let's go over the article.
Meet Dr. Johanna Budwig. She left us in 2003, at the ripe age of 95, but she looked like she was in her 70's. She was nominated six times for the Nobel Prize for medicine, which means that it would be wise to take her health work seriously.
Nobel Prize nominations are inconsequential and unprovable. Nominees are not ever informed that they have been nominated and the nominees are never published or known. I could say that I'm a 20 time Nobel Prize nominee and no one could prove or disprove that. Also, thousands of nominees are nominated by thousands of scientists all over the world each year. We call her a saint, but doctors-in-the-know thought of her as a god. Did we mention that she cured cancer ― not treated ― but cured it in "terminally ill" patients; even patients which the establishment had surrendered to fate, claimed were "untreatable", and gave a death sentence to? We're not talking about specific or rare types of cancer either. She cured whatever type of cancer that was thrown at her, and she did it relatively quickly, cheaply, easily, and permanently; using non-toxic ingredients, which were without any side-effects whatsoever.
You ever hear the saying, "if its too good to be true..." a cure for any kind of cancer with no side effect and almost no cost. This is absolute lunacy to believe such a statement. A cure for any kind of cancer that costs a billion dollars and you lose your right eye - I wouldn't even believe THAT. Her medicine actually made her patients stronger, and her cure rate was over 90%, including the worst "terminal" cases.
Absolutely no reference or proof. If you're going to make extraordinary claims, you better have extraordinary proof. You read that right; we did indeed say that her permanent cure rate was over 90%. Did we mention no side-effects? Dr. Bugwig's successes greatly contrast the facts that the life-long cure rate from standard chemotherapy is less than 4% for most types of cancer, and that chemotherapy is known to cause future cancers.
Again, completely untrue. Cure rates for some cancers like BCR-ABL leukemias are very high and many cancers cause no problem even with no treatment whatsoever. Chemotherapy does not cause future cancers. Radiation therapy does. The author is most likely confusing the two. We have not mentioned the most incredible aspect that is still being suppressed by the lucrative cancer industry: Dr. Budwig's secret weapons against cancer were common cottage cheese and
flax seed oil. She quickly became enemy #1 to the pharmaceutical and nuclear industries. They did not like the prospect of people having the choice between their debilitating and bankrupting treatments, or simply opening their refrigerator for a cure.
There is an industry that makes more money and is more powerful than the pharma industry. That is the insurance industry. If there was a cheap effective treatment for cancer, it would make them BILLIONS of dollars because every dollar they have to pay to pharma or hospitals for cancer treatment is a dollar away from their bottom line. They would be ALL OVER IT. They have been so effective at suppressing her Noble Prize worthy work, that for many of our readers, this will be their first instance of learning of the good doctor, or her famous Budwig Diet. Her bombshell findings were first published in the early 1950's.
She published 5 papers total in her career. None of them in any prestigious journal. Only 3 of them relating to this topic. Hardly Nobel Prize worthy. Anyone want to make a bet as to when major networks like Fox News and ABC News are going to cover this story? We're betting never. They're team players.
Everything You've Been Told About Cancer is a Lie
First and foremost, cancer is not merely an outbreak of tumors. We know the establishment treats them as the same, but it would be a waste of time and space to go there.
"The establishmen" at least in the developed world, does not treat all cancers the same. We have more important things to discuss in this article than cataloging their (often intentional) stupidity and incompetence. For now, we'll simply state that perpetual treatments (creating life-long customers) is the overall goal, instead of curing.
This is just evil. To assert that physicians are purposely not curing their patients because they want life-long customers?! WTF?! really? You see, a dead patient is not profitable, nor is a healthy patient. The money is made somewhere in the middle ― patients who are alive ― barely. Cancer is essentially a modern man-made disease. There is evidence of it existing in ancient history, but cancer was extremely rare in ancient history, except in cities with cases of mass poisoning (again a man-made disease).
Cancer was extremely rare in ancient history because people didn't live long enough to get cancer. It's hard to get cancer when you're dying of infectious diseases because antibiotics and immunizations haven't been discovered yet. That's the major reason. The other reason is that our world is more polluted than it was but over all, the lower life expectancy is a far greater factor Now, cancer is expected to strike one person out of every three, and this rate is rising rapidly.
one out of every three is probably an underestimation. If you live long enough, all of us will get cancer. In fact, most people over the age of 70 have some form of cancer and they just don't know it and they will most likely die of some other process - usually heart disease - before the cancer becomes a problem The Unholy Cancer Trinity
Toxins, radiation, and acidosis are the unholy trinity of cancer. The combined damage from toxins, radiation, malnutrition (often caused by pharmaceuticals), and illness leads to acidosis, which is the final stage of this misunderstood condition. When a person's body chemistry becomes acidic from the aforementioned factors, then his blood's ability to retain and carry oxygen is severely diminished. Healthy individuals have a blood oxygen level of between 98 and 100 as measured by a pulse oximeter, but cancer patients routinely show around 60.
People do not walk around with a pulse ox of 60. If your blood oxygen level is at 60 you're in the ICU, barely conscious and probably going to die soon. All cancer patients and non cancer patients that walk around and can say their own name correctly have a pulse ox of greater than 95 Oxygen is replaced in a cancer patient's blood with wastes such as
carbon dioxide. The oxygen starvation caused by acidosis leads to the formation of tumors as cells must mutate to derive their
energy from a fermentation process.
Uh, no. Cancer is not caused by hypoxia. If that were the case, we'd see lots of cancers in denver. This theory was debunked DECADES ago. Normal cells obtain energy from oxygen, but oxygen-starved cells must mutate to using a type of direct sugar fermentation, which is really the body's self defense. Of course, this is not as "clean" as oxygen-based energy, and the waste products of fermentation build in the tissues causing even higher toxicity. Eventually the entire immune system is debilitated by the process of cleaning these wastes, so that it can no longer cope with the removal of unhealthy cells. This allows the cancer cells to multiply and spread unchecked to create the symptom of tumors, which is in the latter stages of this process.
All the above was proved by Dr. Otto Warburg, and he won the Nobel Prize for it in 1931.
Yes he believed this theory and espoused it in the 1930s. Prominent physicians and scientists also believed that smoking was good for your health in the 1950s Funny you've never heard about it, huh? Are you still walking for the cure? Don't worry, we felt horribly suckered when we learned too. Meanwhile, the industry is still murdering people for
profit, while "searching for the cure".
The secret to beating cancer is that life-giving breath of God ― oxygen. Technically, it is not that simple, but it is almost that simple. The real trick is getting the oxygen into the deep tissue cells, and getting them to "eat" it again. Dr. Budwig's regimen is just one of many for stimulating that.
Wrong again. If you give cancer cells oxygen, they will grow like crazy. Cancer cells do use glycolysis but that is only because they have outgrown their blood supply and do not get supplied all the oxygen they want. If you give it to them, they will have explosive growth. In fact, there is a treatment that is used to help with severe infections and wound problems called hyperbaric oxygen which is basically a way of delivering super concentrated oxygen to your body. The number one contraindication to this treatment is if the patient also has cancer because we discovered that if you put cancer patients in hyperbaric oxygen, their tumor growth rate climbs Most cancer cures (not treatments) involve adjusting the body's pH beyond neutral, and into an alkaline state.
No, most cancer cures involve catching the thing early and cutting it all out before it gets too big. There's plenty more lunacy out there on the web. Places like http://www.cancertutor.com